Tenviq vs Divjoy
Divjoy generates a starting point. Tenviq ships a product. Different job, different buyer.
The decision, in two lists
One of these should describe your project.
Pick Divjoy if
- you want a visual generator to pick a stack and download a template
- you are building a simple CRUD app or a non-B2B product
- you prefer to wire your own auth, billing, and org logic from scratch
- you want to explore multiple stack combos before committing
Pick Tenviq if
- you already know you are building a B2B SaaS
- you want multi-tenant organizations, admin, and plan gating already wired
- you want to skip the generator step and start from a product-shaped codebase
- you value opinionated depth over configurable breadth
Six angles that decide it
Where Divjoy and Tenviq actually differ.
A generated project tailored to your picked options.
A complete B2B SaaS codebase with auth, billing, orgs, admin, AI assistant.
Developers who want a scaffold and will build the product on top.
Technical founders who want the product shape already in place.
Basic. You add orgs, roles, admin yourself.
Organizations, invitations, roles, admin panel, billing gating — by default.
Stripe integration via chosen template.
Stripe + plan-gated product logic. Billing shapes the product.
Configurable scaffolding.
Opinionated product foundation.
Weeks after the generator.
Days. The foundation is already B2B-shaped.
Feature matrix
Row by row, what ships by default.
| Feature | Tenviq | Divjoy |
|---|---|---|
| Template generator | ||
| Multi-tenant organizations | ||
| Admin panel | ||
| Plan-gated features | ||
| AI assistant scaffold | ||
| Stack choice | Next.js + Prisma (fixed) | Configurable |
| Fit for B2B SaaS | Built for it | Bring your own |
| Pricing model | One-time | One-time |
Bottom line
Use Divjoy if you want a visual generator for a simple app and plan to build B2B logic yourself. Buy Tenviq if you want to skip scaffolding entirely and start from a B2B SaaS foundation that already shipped orgs, admin, and billing gating.